Here is a great database for you to find out the possible contaminants in your tap water. It was put together by the Environmental Working Group and can tell you, based on your city the possible problems with your tap water. It's called the National Tap Water Quality Database. This data was collected for 42 states over a period of 2 1/2 years. Curiously, there were 140 different chemicals found in many drinking water supplies that have no enforceable safety limits. As we had discussed a few months ago about the contamination of pharmaceuticals in our nation's tap water one starts to think more critically about the amount of unknown things in that wonderfully clear glass of water you are having with your dinner.
I, for one would love to think that I am very conscientious about the water I drink and the containers I put the water in. But that just covers what I drink at home and at work. What about all those times when I go out for dinner and don't order bottled water or the bottled water the restaurant or cafe are offering has no known information on purity. One call I had made to Arrowhead Water (a very popular brand of bottled water in California) a few years ago on how they tested and ensured purity in their water virtually confused the individual on the other end of the phone. Ultimately their response was that they did a visual test and if the water did not look cloudy they continued to bottle it. Well, that was the last time I had Arrowhead water. There is no guarantee that just because you are bottling underground spring water that the spring has not been contaminated with things such as jet fuel, pesticides and herbicides just like our tap water.
Many underground springs are fed by lakes and rivers that have been contaminated by runoff from agriculture, mining or other manufacturing processes. The drinking water I use is Alhambra Crystal Fresh because they filter and process the water 7 different ways before bottling it. Additionally, they test the water for a whole host of contaminants every half hour and have a third party test it as well. The original source of the water is well water so there is no contamination of chloramine (which is really difficult to filter out of the water) or chlorine. I know there are lists of better bottled water choices so I'll try to get back to you on that in a future post.
For more information about the Tap Water Testing Report check out the EWG website.
Share on Facebook





We are living in chloramine hell since it replaced chlorine to disinfect the water in the distribution pipes in 4/06 in my water district in VT.
This may not be a chemical the EWG has not quite cottoned onto yet. We are working to help them become aware of this nightmare.
Chloramine is made from chlorine and ammonia, a terrible combination of chemicals. I don’t know about you, but when I was setting up housekeeping my mother warned me not to mix those two in a bucket to clean with because the fumes would kill me.
Chloramine went into our water in 4/06 and life has been horrible as a result for many people- just under 300 to date- more coming in all the time- in our water district. We call it “chloramine”, singular, but it is officially called chloramines (plural). This is because there are three species of chloramine that can be more or less present, depending on conditions like water temperature, pH, aerosolization of the water, and chlorine to ammonia ratio. They are monochloramine, dichloramine, and trichloramine. All are irritants and each one is more irritating than the one before it.
Symptoms being experienced here since the switch to chloramine:
Skin: dry, red, burning, inflamed, itchy skin or rashes. Cracked and bleeding skin, welts and open sores.
Respiratory: sinus congestion, runny nose, sneezing, coughing, wheezing, and even full-blown asthma-like reactions.
Digestive: dry mouth, dry/swollen throat, acid reflux, irritable bowel-like symptoms.
Eyes: dry, burning, tearing, stinging, blurry vision.
Here are some other things to consider as you think about chloramine:
*The World Health Organization (WHO) says that chloramine is about 2,000 and 100,000 times less effective than chloramine at the inactivation of e.Coli and rotaviruses respectively. It takes 25x as much chloramine as chlorine to kill pathogens in the water as fast as chlorine does.
*There are no human or animal studies on the skin or respiratory effects of chloraminated water, or on the health effects of chloramine, in general. Doctors cannot diagnose chloramine-related symptoms. They are completely at a loss to help their patients -even if it did occur to them that a chemical in the tap water might be what is causing the problems their patients experience.
*Chloramine is much more corrosive to indoor plumbing (as well as to our bodies) than chlorine, leaching lead into the water from copper pipes, “lead-free” brass fittings and lead solder. (Google marc edwards + lead + chloramine to learn more about this.) Chloraminated tap water corrodes rubber toilet flappers and gaskets very quickly. It also causes pin-holing in copper pipes. Water districts commonly add phosphates to the water as a “corrosion inhibitor” to coat the pipes with, and keep lead from leaching into the water. Wonder how well that works. Phosphates have their own list of problems, one being that they are food for microorganisms and bacteria, supporting them to increase in numbers within the distribution pipes and the pipes in our homes. So, chloramine, the inferior disinfectant, now has an even bigger problem trying to keep the water free of bacteria and organisms. Chloramine wreaks havoc on PVC pipes.
*You cannot boil or distill chloramine out of water like you can chlorine. And if you put a bowl of chloraminated water on the counter, the chloramine will take weeks to dissipate out of the water. Chlorine takes a couple of hours to. There is no carbon filter that completely removes chloramine, like a Brita or Pur filter, for instance. Only LOTS of carbon and reverse osmosis will get the job done- VERY expensive, extremely wasteful, and only good for cold water. Plus, the risk of pathogen-laden filters is much higher than when the water you are filtering is disinfected with chlorine because chloramine is such an inferior disinfectant to chlorine (and most other forms of water disinfection).
We know of people from all over the U.S, and Scotland who are suffering from the same symptoms that we are since chloramine went into their municipal water: Los Angeles, San Diego, NY, FL, TX, CO, LA, ME, NH, OH, MA, KS, GA, OK, VA, Washington DC, KY, MO, and Scotland. We are working with citizen groups who are concerned about chloramine in NY, PA, and CA. Go look at our websites and get educated before it’s too late. Maybe you can stop them from switching to chloramine where you live. www.chloramine.org, http://vce.org/chloramine.html, www.chloramineinfocenter.net
And if chloramine comes into your water and you get symptoms, then get active about it. There are more and more who are- you won’t be alone.
Why Chloramine?
A new EPA rule is causing water districts all over the country to switch to chloramine as a disinfectant in the distribution pipes. Chloramine is the cheap lazy man’s way to meet this rule. There are other much safer and doable ways to handle this: prefiltration and/or UV light to remove precursers, followed in the distribution pipes with chlorine is one. And there are plenty of water systems in the U.S. who do not use chloramine to meet this rule. It doesn’t have to be.
Posted by: Ellen Powell | June 04, 2008 at 07:16 AM
I forgot to address the issue of regulation of chloramine disinfection products (DBPs) in my long winded post above. The only DBPs that chloramine makes that are regulated are the ones that chlorine also makes. Chloramine has its own DBPs, many of which are much more toxic than the ones of chlorine the EPA made this new rule about, such as causing single strand DNA breakage in cells (mutation). Nitrosamines are another of chloramine's DBPs that are intensely toxic. There are plenty more.
When chemicals in drinking water are not regulated that means that the water districts do not have to test for them. Our water could be loaded with dangerous DBPs made by chloramine and we don't know because no one's testing for those.
Posted by: Ellen Powell | June 04, 2008 at 07:27 AM
Dear Dr. Wang,
Arrowhead Brand Mountain Spring Water takes the safety of our product very seriously, and we would like to address statements on your blog about our product’s regulation, safety and testing standards. Unfortunately, it sounds like there is a misunderstanding about how we test our spring water, including Arrowhead Natural Spring Water, and we hope to set the record straight.
It’s important to understand who sets the safety standards for bottled water. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) establishes rules for bottled water as a food product. By law, FDA regulations for bottled water must be as strong and protective of public health as the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulations for tap water.
At Nestlé Waters, we follow a 10-step process to ensure our water is of the highest quality, taste, and composition before it is hygienically sealed in convenience-sized containers. We test our products throughout the bottling process and conduct hourly tests on finished products to guarantee the quality of our water. We screen for over 200 possible contaminants annually, even more than the FDA requires. For more information on our 10-step process, please click here: http://www.nestle-watersna.com/pdf/NWNA_10_Step_SW_Process.pdf.
We stand behind the quality of our products, and water quality reports for Arrowhead and all of our brands can be found at www.nestle-watersna.com.
We think this information will be of interest to your readers, and we hope you consider including these facts in your next post.
Sincerely,
Jane Lazgin
Director, Corporate Communications
Nestlé Waters North America
777 West Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, CT 06830
(203) 863-0240
Posted by: Jane Lazgin | June 16, 2008 at 09:10 AM
Handy piece of writing, I favor to create information and facts for the reason that it allows bloggers for getting far more engaged and towards the possibility to obviously know from each and every other.
Posted by: Puma Shoes | August 12, 2010 at 05:22 PM
Saying and doing are two different things,aren't they?
Posted by: ugg bailey button | November 02, 2010 at 07:14 PM
i love you post
Posted by: taobao | November 11, 2010 at 12:12 AM
oh, I really like the style of your writing!
Posted by: buying from taobao | November 16, 2010 at 07:02 PM
I received 1 st credit loans when I was very young and this helped my family very much. But, I need the small business loan as well.
Posted by: LilianaDeleon31 | December 05, 2010 at 04:49 PM
I have read articles about of this topic but this is unique is very interesting and it has a lot of good information and it was very useful for me... Well keep doing that good job thanks for all..
Posted by: Metro Etherrnet | May 22, 2011 at 02:30 PM
It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.
Posted by: MBT Shoes | July 18, 2011 at 01:56 AM
new era 59fifty hat Be used to be melancholy, used to missing you and used to waiting for you , but never used to without you.
Posted by: new era 59fifty hat | December 05, 2011 at 01:45 AM